Fashion ‘unlikely’ to meet Paris Climate Accord goals
According to Textile Exchange’s latest report, the industry is producing more than ever before and shifts from conventional materials to lower-impact, sustainable alternatives have declined.
During the last few years, news of fashion’s pivot to more eco-friendly practices has repeatedly made headlines.
Whether genuinely impactful or an obvious bid to keep consumers interested, these updates on how brands are ‘doing better’ for the planet have seemingly trumped our consciousness of their wrongdoings.
Amid all the noise, revelations of greenwashing do little to sway our trend-chasing nature and, retailers continue to churn out product after product.
This is because while change is happening sector-wide (albeit at a snail’s pace), shifts to lower-impact, sustainable alternatives such as recycled polyester (rPET) or anything regeneratively cultivated have declined as international fibre production remains on the up.
In fact — rather alarmingly — not only is it still increasing, but this exhaustive resource use is at the uppermost level it’s ever been, an all-time high of 113 millions tonnes, expected to keep growing to 149 million tonnes by 2030, which Textile Exchange says should act as a ‘major warning sign.’
To put the situation into perspective, synthetic fibres reign as a low-cost option favoured in 64 per cent of production. This is followed not-so-closely by cotton and other plant fibres (28 per cent), man-made cellulosics (6.4 per cent), and animal fibres (1.62 per cent).
Within the synthetics category, polyester production has notably increased, from 57.7 million tonnes in 2020 to 60.5 million tonnes in 2021, despite the recently discovered threat to human and environmental health posed by microplastic shedding.
And, regardless of the fact that rPET accounts for a significant share of brand sustainability commitments, its market share has barely risen, going from 14.7 to 14.8 per cent since January.
As explained by the report, without drastic measures to reduce volumes, substitute conventional textiles with ‘preferred options,’ and promote innovation within the next decade, the industry will fail to slash greenhouse gas emissions at the raw materials stage (known as tier 4 of the supply chain) in line with efforts to limit global warming.
‘We need to rapidly accelerate the replacement of virgin fossil fuel-based materials with lower-impact alternatives,’ says the non-profit’s strategy director, Beth Jensen.
‘At Textile Exchange, our vision is a world in which these solutions are the accessible default.’
In Jensen’s opinion, the best way to ‘make a change within the eight years we have left’ is to recapture value from existing virgin materials by curbing the output of new fibres and quickly scaling textile recycling technology and the necessary supporting infrastructure.
She also suggests the industry shift its priorities from short-term economic growth to long-term resilience, kicking into gear awareness-raising around material substitution.
‘In addition to accelerating the replacement of virgin fossil fuel-based materials with lower impact alternatives, including innovative solutions, we also need to reduce the amount of new materials being extracted and produced overall,’ she adds.
‘It really does require a departure from business as usual.’